But inching ever closer to Adobe in functionalities and keeping retail prices down could potentially torpedo Adobe. It's hard as a user to judge how much such functionalities would influence the price in a negative way. So, it beggars belief that it is still not included in Affinity Designer 2, Affinity Photo 2 and Affinity Publisher 2. That's abuse of privilege and it has moved me to chuck Adobe overboard!īut still, an AutoTrace function is yesterday's technology in this scope, really. ![]() But it's VASTLY overpriced software, which even slaps on a 50% increase in the price for European users, and you don't even get to own the damn thing. And to be able to stay at this user's comfort prices, with good and at times great Software, we cannot expect everything. Will Affinity continue to be competitive with ever new graphics capabilities following new Softwares, Hardwares and even AI?Īffinity is affordable for hobbyists as well as professionals. I can't see any (significant) difference in Inpainting, Background Removal and such from V1.Īnd since this is tangential to the Algorithms used in AutoTrace, converting Bitmap into Vector, the question should be asked I'm not too impressed with the image recognition functionalities in Affinity Photo V2 either. But it's a lot of back and forth, potential security issues and general nuisance. Sure, you can do it online, with mixed results. The problem with potrace is not that it can't produce accurate, good looking results.It's such a bummer that this relatively simple, yet essential functionality is still not onboard in Affinity Designer V2. ![]() It can do that, although some trial & error with the settings often is required to get that. ![]() The big problem is it creates many, many more nodes than manual tracing or a 'smarter' algorithm would produce - sometimes hundreds of times more - to get a reasonably accurate tracing. There are various suggestions to mitigate this problem, like applying a small amount of blur or using a lower resolution version of the image, but in my experience this is far to tedious & hit or miss to be a viable solution for more than the occasional conversion.Īnother problem it shares with every other algorithmic tracer I have ever used is all the vectors produced have no stroke instead, most are stacked on one or more larger outlines filled with the stroke color(s). This has the benefit of allowing very nuanced changes in the equivalent of the stroke width, but it makes it very difficult to organize the vector elements into logical groups so they can be modified or copied & pasted into other projects. The Affinity staff have said they will offer a tracer only if & when they are happy with its capabilities. Step 1 - Create your document in Affinity Designer Open Affinity Designer and on the Welcome page click New Document. It is just a guess but I suspect they would like to avoid these issues & offer an "it just works" tracer that requires little or no trail & error to get something very close to what a skilled user could get by manually tracing the image. Choose your preferred document size and click Create. This will create a new blank document or canvas area. ![]() Step 2 - Add a Pixel Layer In order to start your project you need to first add a Pixel Layer. The Vector Brush Tool in Affinity Designer allows brush strokes to remain fully editable. I think this would require much more advanced tracing algorithms than are currently in use, possibly ones that model human visual perception to determine what can & cannot be ignored, much like the lossy MPEG compressors do, but only in the spacial domain. You are able to edit the strokes, change the color of individual strokes and much more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |